Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
This Torah class is brought to you by
torahanytime.com.
Okay, welcome everyone. We continue in
our series on tfila, which is dedicated
by our good friend Tzvika Roz
Rose, le'iluy nishmas his brother Tsvi
ben Levi Yitzchak.
And nishmas Shimon ben Eliyahu
as a zechus for his whole mishpacha.
Okay, so now we're
continuing in the inyan of carbonos.
We spoke last week about the parshas
hatamid
and why the parshas hatamid is not
mentioned in shmoneh esrei.
And we mentioned from the Yad Yehuda and
that's that's because since shmoneh
esrei technically could be recited all
day long, if the tamid would be there,
it would not necessarily be appropriate
for it to be mentioned more than once a
day. Now,
now we're going to talk about the the
concept of eizehu mekoman, the subject
of eizehu mekoman.
The Shulchan Aruch tells us
a hatam
Lama omer mishnah eizehu mekoman? Why
did they select to say eizehu mekoman?
So, a very interesting machaber. Kavvu
lishnois acher parshas hatamid perek
eizehu mekoman. They are kove'a to learn
after the tamid eizehu mekoman ubrayso
d'Rabbi Yishmael. Why? K'dei she'yiska
kol adam l'limud b'chol yom mikra,
mishnah, u'gemara. We want every Jew to
be zocheh every day to have Chumash, to
have mishnah, and to have gemara. The
brayso d'Rabbi Yishmael have a makom
gemara. The brayso d'Rabbi Yishmael is
in the place of gemara. She'ha medrash
k'gemara. Medrash is like gemara. By the
way,
where do we see medrash is like gemara?
That's mamesh what we just learnt that
the gemara on Yiral Avos brought a raya,
you say birchas haTorah from the fact
that birchas haTorah was made before
medrash.
Now,
I'm going to share with you the question
I had on this.
And that is
didn't we already fulfill this
by
after the Torah saying
you are a car
which is a Mishna and then again which
is a
in Shabbos. So, haven't we already
accomplished this?
But in any event, interestingly, the
Mishna brings down from the
Shla.
And we say you are a car, right? That's
a second in the Torah.
You are a car is a second and
again is a and then again is is based on
the Shabbos.
So, the Shla writes whenever when you
say I'm a man of
you know
Torah is
you should sing it in the of Mishna is.
So, we learn from here something
interesting that the same way has Mishna
had a specific in. In fact, they say
used to learn Mishna to this special in.
In fact, there's a to Israel, I believe
in them
that says when the says
that
the Mishna is missing words, this is
what it means to say how could you say
the Mishna is missing words? So, the
says because it had a specific in. And
sometimes words would not fit into the
so they would take out the words. That's
the
Mishna and again.
Okay. The Torah says the Mishna is
Mishna and again and again and again and
again
after the
because of what
says in the again and again and again
and again and again and again and again
and again and again and again and the
says
what? So, you spend your first 40 years
on this.
40 years on Mishna, 40 years on nobody
knows how long they're going to live.
Maybe you'll never make it to that age.
I have no idea how I am going to live.
Does a person know how long they're
going to live?
Answers
and again and again and again and again
and this is only needed for the days.
Midrash is like Talmud.
The Baraita of Rabbi Shimon is the very
beginning of the Sifra, which is Torat
Kohanim, she who writes the halakha of
korbanot, which is the
the head of all the korbanot. So, kavua
etzo korbanot. In other words, there is
a specific kind of a connection between
the Baraita of Rabbi Shimon and Eizehu
Mekoman, because the Baraita of Rabbi
Shimon is the first Baraita of the Torat
Kohanim,
which is the beginning of korbanot. So,
they juxtapose it to the korbanot.
A Mishnah Eizehu Mekoman kavua etzo la
halakha korbanot. Um, excuse me, a
Mishnah Eizehu Mekoman kavua after
parshat Tamid. The Mishnah of Eizehu
Mekoman they established after the
Tamid. Mishum d'ksiv, "Uv'chol makom
muktar mugash l'shmi." It says, "In
every place which is
which that you bring korbanot to my my
name." V'chi b'chol makom muktar mugash?
Do you really actually bring korbanot in
every place?
These are talmidei chachamim that are
osek in halakhot of avodah. B'chol makom
mal'ani'alim k'ilu makhtir magishim
l'shmi. Talmidei chachamim that they
learn halakhot of avodah, it's like they
bring a korban everywhere.
So, in other words, we learn, we say
Eizehu Mekoman, because by learning
about korbanot, it's like offering
korbanot.
Now, why davka Eizehu Mekoman? There are
many Mishnayot about korbanot. Why davka
Eizehu Mekoman?
So, I think everyone is familiar with
the idea, and this is cited by the Rebbe
Nachman is that this is the only
Parashan Shas that does not have a
Machlokes.
This is one Masechta where there's no
Machlokes.
So this is actually a very interesting
subject.
The Beis Yosef quotes the Ra'ah that
they were Masikin Is Hamakom because
there's no Machlokes.
So in the Sefer Ginzei Chaim
from Reb [ __ ] Reizman, the author I
believe of Avnei Mishpat,
he says there is a Machlokes.
Because Pesach einu ne'echal ela ad
chatzos, right? The Mishna says. The
Korban Pesach is only until chatzos.
Wait a second. That is for sure not
unanimous. That's the opinion of Reb
Eliezer ben Azarya. But we all know that
Rebbi Akiva holds that the Pesach is
um
that the Pesach is eaten
um ad alos hashachar. So how could you
say Is Hamakom and there's no Machlokes?
Sure there's Machlokes. It's saying the
Halacha is like Reb Eliezer ben Azarya.
The Hikshu de yesh Machlokes da behada
Pesach einu ne'echal ela ad chatzos.
Velo ikasha midi.
This is not sure. Da Hakavana de Beis
Perek Choshev Halachos Halachos pesukos.
What it means is Is Hamakom is the one
Perek. It just says definitive Halacha
and it doesn't mention Machlokes. It
definitely refers to Halachos that may
be the subject of Machlokes, but in the
Perek there is no debate. It only it
brings the definitive Halacha. In kein
Halacha berura. This is clear Halacha
because I mean it about Kam Kuf Beis. De
Be Maida Choshev de Kol Ha Inyanim
de yada al tahtona bereish Perek Asachta
um de Mashma de kein Halacha.
We know that when
when a Mishna quotes something in a
certain fashion, that's indicative of if
we pass in that way. So too,
it's included is all um everything
mentioned in who may come on is the
halakh is halakh absuka.
Now,
comes the Tiferes Yisrael
and he adds a another interesting
nakuda.
Contrary to popular belief
that Rebbe wrote the Mishnayos,
it's really incorrect. Rebbe did not
write the Mishnayos.
This cannot be reiterated enough. It is
a mistake to think Rebbe wrote the
Mishnayos.
In the times of Moshe Rabbeinu, they had
Mishna. Some of it was even recorded.
According to the Hagigah, they actually
had a much larger corpus of material.
Rebbe condensed the Mishnayos and he
consolidated the Mishnayos.
But and the way he did it was he took
out
much information and really the Shla
Hakadosh writes, this is the real
explanation for
Maseches Tani.
Our Mishna is missing words, but it said
those words in the original Mishna and
this is how it used to read.
So there is an original text of Mishna
that dates back
according to many even to Sinai, even to
the Midbar.
Aizehu Mekoman are the original words of
Mishna. Meaning what's unique about
Aizehu Mekoman, we don't know for sure
other Mishnayos divrei this, divrei
that, divrei this, but we know Aizehu
Mekoman is the original text of the
Mishna going back to Moshe Rabbeinu.
Oid ner alei demukhakh mikhan dekol
perek zeh
midei ein bo makhlokes, since there's no
makhlokes in Aizehu Mekoman lo shanu
mamash kemo she nimseru lanu miMoshe
Rabbeinu miSinai.
This is the exact text that was given
from Moshe Rabbeinu from Sinai.
Uh so you'll say, "What is the raya?"
By one of the carbonos it says, "This is
nechal lifnim min haklaim."
You could eat this carbon within the
curtains.
Huh? Within the curtains? If the Mishna
was written in time of the Beis
Hamikdash stood, it should say within
the wall.
What do you mean within the curtains?
They only had curtains in the times of
Moshe Rabbeinu in the Mishkan. This is
indicative of the fact that eilu v'eilu
divrei Elokim chaim, the words are of
most ancient origin. V'hai ta'ama
amrinan perek zeh
b'chol yom, because we want to say the
words of the original text of the
Mishna. That's quite a amazing idea.
Um Rebbe, wouldn't there have been
curtains also in the Mishkan like in
Shilo and in the other um makomos prior
to the um Beis Hamikdash?
Possibly, but um
you know, the that wasn't one of the
choices of when the Mishna was written,
you know? In other words, either the
Mishna was written in times of the
Tana'im
or the Mishna always existed. Oh, yeah,
right?
So in the Sefer Nefesh Hachaim,
the Nefesh Hachaim was written by Reb
Reuven Margolios,
the author Margolios Chaim.
And he says, "Look in the Tiferes
Yisrael who says eilu v'eilu divrei
Elokim chaim
was taught to be made Moshe when the
Mishkan stood. And the raya is it says
"nechal lifnim min haklaim".
But says Reb Reuven Margolios, "Ulam
hein k'var he'irah haTosafos Yom Tov
b'Zevachim al asher yimtza b'nechal
b'chol ha'ir."
He says, "What are you talking about?
The Mishna wasn't written in times of
Moshe because we have another statement
it can be eaten in the whole city. That
clearly is not referring to when the
Mishkan stood. That's clearly referring
to when the temple stood when the base
said I'm going to die to
Mishnah Parah Zeraim may alias Babel.
In my opinion, this was Mishnah was
taught when they went up in the times of
Babel. But alas, this coin is missing
rats when they start rebuilding land
share.
Kishka baby a lot of
little
boy in the
ocean climb like how column Lazarus.
When they first built the
how they had to make climb.
Cuz they didn't have walls.
I'm already who does
give an application by boy.
We have this in a Joyce or climb the
average user.
That's when this Mishnah was taught cuz
it says climb and it says ear. So I
think the Nefesh Maya based on the test
is Yom Kippur sort of challenges this
idea of the
fastest route that this Mishnah was
the original words of times of Moshiach
because yes, it says climb and it also
says the whole year.
So let's conclude
with a very interesting analysis of
Shimon Schwab.
He says Parah
the fifth paragraph
and it's brought in the city of Amram
going.
Like it says in Kadushin of Lamed.
That it was arranged in the city of
Amram Kamisha and
my Kadushin
Mikra Mishnah and Gamara.
Titus says that.
Someone open up a Titus and Kadushin of
Lamed.
Do I have a Kadushin here? I don't know
if I have a Kadushin.
Titus Kadushin of Lamed the Titus called
with Amram going.
Okay.
Now,
very interesting.
And the carbon and son of says
that mikra is the Talmud, mishna is a
and gemara is the brice of mishna.
Now, here's the thing.
If you diving
uh
sh- shmone esrei
and besides the first bracha, you just
say the words and you don't know what
you're talking about.
He asked the guy, "What are the
lamashinam?" Lamashinam,
those are jelly beans. And you say, "And
what does it mean
barachamim tashev?"
I don't know. Barachamim tashev,
it means God uh
rebuild the wall of the wall of China.
Are you to the midst of tfila? I think
so.
You don't have to know what the words
mean.
You're not required to know what the
words just say the words. Just the first
bracha of shmone esrei. I don't know,
maybe if you think it means something
else entirely. I don't think you have to
know what the words mean. It's still
tfila.
Um when it comes to chumesh, let's say
you say words of chumesh and you don't
know what it's talking about. Do you get
s'char talmud torah? You bet.
But let's say you learn mishna and
gemara, you don't know what it's talking
about. Do you get s'char limud? No.
Tarshavata you must understand. Now, if
the purpose of makayman is to be
learning, if you don't know what it
means, you're not doing anything.
So, um says of shlav that benay kedaysha
shlav limud for it to be considered
learning,
you have to know what you're talking
about. They know tfila, this is not like
prayer
is wrapped with
that someone who says the words bechaved
Hashem
and he honors Hashem in his lips, aval
libo chanimai, but his heart is not with
him.
They sham
magrois but philosi even though it's yes
a very big deficiency
become a
your words have
meaning like we've said in the past the
endowed nuclear energy into the words so
whether you understand it or not you're
activating the words
but when it comes to Mishnah lots of
how could you call if you don't
understand
and that's why the schwa says
you need to say
with the nigan of learning that's what
we started with why should you say
because you're learning
you're learning and if you're not
learning in other words so and who just
rattles through
doesn't know what he's talking about
should not say it
why it's called it's about
what are you wasting you wasting your
time
you know people are very worried about
don't throw out crumbs how about
on your life so you better know what
you're saying if you don't know what
you're saying it's not learning
now says
this is not the place to explain
however
it is important if you're going to say
you should learn it so you know what
you're talking about
now why did they pick
number one there's no
number two because it explains all the
and as
taught and this is an idea we've
mentioned that when you're
each part of corresponds to another area
of the Mishkan do you remember that
sheer that each part of
you're entering the realm of the Mishkan
and where are you during
the Azara and Azara Mukaiman discusses
all the various carbonos. And number
three,
this Mishnah is a very early Mishnah
because the Tanna uses the word "klim".
In the Beis Hamikdash, there were no
klim, even though we saw Reb Reuven
Margolies said uh
that it may be referring to the Olei
Bavel.
However, here's the million-dollar
question of the day.
If the purpose of saying it is to learn,
imagine you see a guy,
you come into a shul one night, and you
say, "What are you learning?"
I'm learning the third Mishnah of Pirkei
Avos.
And then you come in the next day. "What
are you learning, Reb Yid?" "I'm
learning the third Mishnah of Pirkei
Avos."
And you come in 4 months later. You say,
"Reb Yid, what are you What are you
holding in?" "I'm holding in the third
Mishnah of Pirkei Avos."
And then let's say you get married, and
you go to a different community, and you
come back to visit 12 years later, and
that Jew is sitting there in the back of
the shul. "Hey, Reb Yid, where are you
up to?" He says, "I'm learning the third
Mishnah of Pirkei Avos." And then 50
years later, you see I mean, you know,
it's there's an expression, move on,
pal. You know, why is he
So, if the whole purpose of Azam
Mukaiman is to get in learning, wouldn't
it make more sense on the on Yom Rishon,
learn the first perek of Brachos, Yom
Sheini, the second perek? And this way,
over the course of the year, if you
learned a perek of Mishnayos a day,
I think you would finish in, you know,
maybe 2 years or so.
So, why don't we do that? Why
say why repeat the same thing again and
again and again and again?
So, Reb Schwab says as follows.
tell. What does it mean or
Eason?
Then
Russia and like a lot of money.
The difference between and
I knew I knew
I knew I knew I knew I knew I knew I
knew I knew.
So
I bought the lawyer
to
the
community in a row.
I bought a lawyer
are both complete him.
But
someone who learns his parrot 100 times
to someone who learns 101.
So after the famous question, really
there's no similarity between someone
who learns 100 and 101. I would think
that they're quite similar. In other
words, if you have if you know, there
were 100 people in a show and one guy
learns something 100 times and one guy
learns something 101, they was those
guys got to be the most similar people
in the show.
But the answer is
In the times of the time
they learned everything about pair.
And therefore they needed to
everything a lot of time so they
wouldn't forget it not like us.
We don't have to so much because we have
it in the books, but they had a to
memorize it. Now,
that's why it's called
means review review review review.
How many times do you need to review
something to remember it?
So says
100 times.
Now I tell you the truth.
I don't know if this holds true.
Because
there is a concept the that helps us
remember is
who's 101.
But
is 100. That's the forgetfulness.
But
articulating
that 100 times helps you remember.
Based on the what it says in Shulchan
Aruch,
that if you're
you go back, but if you already said it
30 days, you don't have to go back cuz
you already you already regular.
And the
says the same thing would be if you
repeated 90 times in one day, you don't
have to go back.
So he says that
in 30 days, they're more than 90.
And says I heard from Mosha,
you need to do it 100 times. Now, I'll
tell the truth,
the Sofer argues. Sofer says you need to
do it 101 time.
But is going with a different look,
that you need to do it 100 times.
Meaning the secret of memory according
to is 100. Again,
I would humbly ask that that seems not
to be the case. Meaning, it would seem
certainly based on, you know, the
sources 101 is specific to memory. But
is quoting
that said 100. Okay, so working with his
look,
if 100 helps you remember,
So
if you take that for granted, that all
it is is 100 times,
then
you're going to remember. Now, if
someone learns 100 times, did they learn
or did they not learn?
For the first 100 times, there is an
element of
What's the element of
Maybe I just did it to remember.
But I didn't do it
to learn just to learn. I learned for a
reason.
So the first 100 times are
What's
the time that signifies I'm learning?
That's 101. 101 is the 101 is
That's There is agenda here. you
When you already learned 100 times
that additional time is clean from any
draws, any impurities, any shamans of
This type of learning is Lishma. So up
to 100 you're
you're
because you're also doing it for
yourself. But 101 you're called Lishma.
And
to recognize the have done between
Lishma and Lishma.
Therefore, says
if every day they would be
to learn the first part, the second
part, the third part and every day you
learn something new. So yes, that would
be beautiful, but there would still be a
remnant of but now that we're already on
our 3000 cycle of
Lishma,
there is no personal benefit other than
pure Lishma. So wanted to ensure that
every day of one's life. Look, we all
learn every day. And we have
but maybe the we're learning it's
interesting. I never learned that
before. It's exciting, but to learn the
same exact thing when I get nothing out
of it other than it's pure for no
ulterior motive. So that that ensures
that we
we have that every day. And actually
that's actually a very beautiful reason.
In other words,
you know, you could ask so maybe we
don't have somebody who learns maybe
doesn't have to say this, but there is a
certain
of Lishma.
We want to make sure that it's more than
100 times.
So now I would ask so maybe after 2
years of
100 days, you know, let's change it up,
but that then it becomes really shama.
And that's why we learn by making
and
every year so at least we could be
included in some capacity among the
and the
thank you everyone for joining. Wishing
everyone a beautiful
shaya.
Remember the word I told you.
You've just experienced another Torah
class brought to you by
torahanytime.com.