0:00 / 0:00
Ki Seitzei: The Arizal's Hesped For the Ramak - What Really Happened??? - The Historical Controversy
136 views
Subscribe and hit the bell to see new videos!!! • Visit the Rav's site: https://www.rabbidg.com • Have a Question? Contact the Rav: https://www.rabbidg.com/contact • Order Rabbi Glatstein's Books: https://www.rabbidg.com/rabbi-glatstein-books Date This Shiur Was Given: 8/25/2020 #Torahstudy #Judaism #Jewish #Torah #Spiritual #Rabbi #Chumash #Parasha #Parsha #Gemara
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
this torah class is brought to you by
torahanytime.com
okay good evening everyone
actually we have a really fantastic
subject tonight
it's based on something we may have
mentioned in the past but it will really
open up for us
a whole new subject that i don't believe
we've ever seen before
the apostle says in parashat
if somebody has a sin
maves
with a capital judgment
and
and he will die
and he will be killed
in other words somebody has a sin and
he's liable to capital punishment for
humas
and they kill him
now we know that is that kalhaneskalam
nislan anyone who gets skiller they hang
him afterwards the salisa
is and they hang him on a tree
so tara says he's so land of loss i
always don't let his body remain hanging
overnight
cover take miranda by yamaha you got to
bury him on that day kill alas
it is the disgrace of god that is
hanging rashi explains that a person was
created with selamat like him our
physical features resemble that of god
so if somebody sees
that a person is hanging
they'll think
is in that matzah because we look so
similar
gives the martial if the king has a twin
brother who's a criminal so if they're
going to hang him they have to let the
body down overnight otherwise people are
going to think the king is hanging
do not defile your land
hashem
that hashem your god gives you as an
inheritance okay that's the simple
meaning of the pasik
he's hanging however the whole day
they can't leave him overnight
look a minimal amount of time we let him
hang but he can't hang uh for the entire
night that's the simple meaning of the
passage however
in the safe havoc
now the khaba are not to be confused
with ruby or bachrach but this is the
kabul
by rebel lazar khalil not to be confused
with rebelliour
the python this is an achroin who lived
at the end of the 18th century he gave a
hespid now this rav revelation khalid
was a rav in
zav ludov
and rachnitz and kalin
and he composed the safer arch
and the five megaliths
and he gave the following he delivered
the following words and he recounted a
hespid
that was given
by none other than rav misha israelis
who is the masjid asulas drama who did
he give the hesitate for none other than
his illustrious father-in-law rav shalom
now shalom
is a name that may not be as familiar as
rama but
was the
greatest authority in all of europe in
the 16th century drama
and his rebbe was a biakov palik who
introduced the new method of talmudic
study called topo which is really
impossible to explain because we have
nothing to compare it to but it was some
kind of
intellectual
gymnastics
and
they would use complicated convoluted
analytics to try to train the mind of
the talmudim and this was a a very big
discussion whether this is a proper way
to learn the marau was beamingly opposed
to it many guidance were opposed to it
but rabbi akov palik who was the god
he introduced the system it was followed
by his student
and many great talmudim including the
rama who became his son-in-law including
rav david ganz
okay so how did i learn before just
playing gamora and rashi and prices and
they were learning more straightforward
and
shakna
the straightforward or the gymnastics
so
now the ra and the safer sheriffs you
saw he brings that if you looked in the
ramaz gamora on sanhedrin
where it talks about the name of
mashiach the rama in his handwriting
wrote
i say the name of mashiach is shachna my
father-in-law like the pasik says
so this is the esteem that the uh
was held
and um
like his rebbe
did not write down any of his sakim
and on his matseva of rabbsham it says
that he was marabeth's torah for 40
years without being paid
and
which is a great feat okay basically he
had thousands of tamidim
um
that anybody in europe was was uh a
student of sham shafna in any event
drama
in lublin he was a robin lublin mm-hmm
[Applause]
if a man will have hate
now the word hate means missing
like when david was approached by
basheva and bashar says david when you
die me and will be
missing will be missing
a missing that's what the word hate
means
in fact there's another proof kaileya
what does it say in in the navy
you could shoot to a hare's breath and
not miss
hate means missing
so the ramos said as follows
if a man will have hate
he'll be missing
a reason to die why would somebody be
missing a reason to die because they're
at sadhak
they never sinned
so instead of
translating the israel if a man will
have a sin they translated it
they will be missing a reason to die
this is what the rama said about his
illustrious father-in-law he'll be
missing a reason to die
the humas and the guy dies in other
words you see nebuchadnezzar somebody
who is
dying
and he doesn't have a reason to die he
never committed a sin
why did he die
the salisa is
hinge it blame it
on the primordial sin of admirishine
that when adam ate from that fruit the
verdict of mankind is man always has to
die whether somebody sins or somebody
doesn't sin man always has to die like
the gemaran says
four people died because of the bite of
the snake what does that mean who which
four people benjamin son of yaakov amram
father of moisha yeshi father of david
kill of son of david so even if someone
never sins you're one would end up dying
because of the original sin of the
marisha so this is what the rama said
about his illustrious uh schwer
that he said his fair never sinned and
he has no reason to die so why did my
shiver die
if a man has hate he's lacking he's
missing
mish bad mothers a judgment of death the
whom us and yet he dies how can we wrap
our mind around that crack our head
around it the salisa
blame it on the tree blame it on the on
the sin of the eighth
which is an incredible way to read the
passage simply put if somebody committed
a sin and their judgment is death hang
him on a tree no the rama said on
if a man will be missing a reason to die
and and he dies anyway blame it on the
sunnah
so
i came across the save for this week
called the hassela
by rev
farsal
and he brings at the end of the sapphire
an article that his father wrote now i
don't know who he is you know who he is
yeah
who is he
he's recently yeah
here's your rebbe in israel wow okay
there you go so he bring who's his
father
so he brings an article that his father
wrote what's his name again
am i pronouncing it correctly what's his
name
threshold
there you go okay
that's what it says
um number three
okay
so okay contemporary i figured and he
brings from his father that rebellizer
kalier again an acharya not to be
confused with the python
gave a hespid in 1785.
um excuse me
he yes
himself gave a hespit in 1785 and he set
over a hespid that the rama gave on of
shalom
and this is very suspicious
why is it suspicious
because when did rabsham shakna pass
away he passed away in 1558.
when did
the
when did the
dash live when did he give this hesped
in 1785
that means for 230 years nobody knew
that rama gave this hesperum of shalms
we have no evidence for 230 years from
the time of
died until the khadas in his safer chavo
the aryaka or the arkhadas he wrote all
three swaram wrote a hester that he gave
based on the hasbro that rama said for
absalom so it is
somewhat curious that a period of 230
years passed
and we have no information that the rama
said that
until the year 1785. fine
so repression continues
we have another evidence that drama gave
this hospital also in somewhat of a rare
safe are called yara hawaii
a san jose from
rappaport
and he has another very important diek
in this passage
because apostate says
simply it means if a person will have a
judgment of death but what does hate
mean where does he come into this basic
if it just means a person was sentenced
to that they should say the abish
mishpat mothers somebody has a sentence
of that what do you mean
a sin of a sentence to death the word of
hate is extra
and what does it mean
obviously as if he has
he's going to be killed
so he quotes a shot that the rama said
now interestingly he does not say that
rama gave this shot as a hesped on his
father and law he just quotes the this
is the shot of the rama
that hate could mean a little different
than the khaba says that hate means
missing hate could also mean purity
now how does hate mean purity like what
exactly or vegeta is so purify the house
so he reads the rama rather like this
if man will have hate
he's pure of ishvan mothers of a reason
to die if a man will be pure of a reason
to die the whom us and yet he dies
here you have a guy he said sadiq is no
reason to die there's no reason for
something bad to happen to him
he's admitted he's pure of a reason to
die
and yet he dies why did he die
the salisa is hinged
that's a it's a murder shot
if somebody dies you see somebody a
righteous person that passes on and they
have no reason to die
at the end of the day everyone has to go
because of the sin of the eighth hadas
this is what was the
said over by rabbi rampaport and the
safer yarach
on him this is what the ramos said no
that just that the rama offered this
shot however not that the rama said it
at the hospital
that he doesn't say now the safeway
was published in tough nun
also a little curious that for 240 years
we have no record that the rama said
this
now
here we come to the whopper because i've
known this shot for a very long time i
remember i once heard from malay obama i
must have said it over many times i'm
sure if you've been hearing the shurim
you've heard this before
ravionisan ibishits so i'm working on an
english safer on tu baswat it's almost
ready any day
and
i just quoted the ciaras divas the
rubbing
writes in the aristowash
that not that there are magi the
hesperfur of
even more incredible
that at the levaya of the ramak
who's the ramak
the major court of arrow it was just his
yard site
and he's the author of the term of the
voyra
the ramak was nifter in 1570 so the uh
nifter in 1558 there are macros from
1570. and at his leviah who attended his
avaya none other than they are risal and
who was most pedestrian other than they
are
and what did the arizona say at the
leviathan of the ramak we don't know who
tells us rabiani sinai bishops what is
the vietnamese and i should say number
six that re was doirish at the ramaks
if a man will be missing a reason to die
and
the hummus and he died the talisa is you
should hang it on the senate
so still it's very suspicious
because the ramach was lifted in 1570
and robbie anderson ibishits as we're
about to see
was the rav in much later
very good altona
hamburg vanzbeck
in 1750.
so we're talking about 180 years
with nobody
ever saying a word that the arizona said
this about ramak now that would be huge
you would think that the arizona's
hesped for the ramak was probably like
the most all-time famous hespet and yet
the first record of this is
reviews in about the years 17.
there you go 50. rabianis and abrasions
got to a who we have over here number
seven in the second paragraph in the the
end of the year tough cuff that's 1750
and he was nifter and elo 1764.
so this hesped was given sometime
between 1751 and 1764 a good 180 years
after
the arizona said the husband so now i
was remembering
where he got this from
no
he took it for granted that this is a
dover udua
now i was remembering yesterday that i i
thought i saw this somewhere else and
sure enough
brings down
in this week's parasha
number eight now when did the khida live
i didn't realize that was pretty late
that was 1724 to
the 1806.
brings down in the nfl
if a man will have a sin
and a judgment of death so he darshans
he says by the way the arizal said
at the hespid
the khida get it from
and this was amazing to me
because we did once point out that the
khida in the shame haggadilam where he
lists all the dhyalam who lived before
him
you have one you guys say i have a shame
agolam
next time you go to the swarm store you
got to buy yourselves a shame on them
they just came out with a brand new one
with like all kinds of footnotes
yeah
brother finder told me he just got it i
spoke to him yesterday yeah
no here's you have a guy the guy yonko
beryl never committed a sin and yet he
died why did he die it's because uh
it's because
because of the it's hadas because
mankind has a zuhama in them and the
only way to get it out is to go into the
earth and the order
is representation
it's a sin but the person who died never
sinned it's because his ancestor adam
the answer because he is a descendant so
he has no choice but to pay the price
for what other mauritian did
so now
we once mentioned that there is a
goddaught one of a number of guys who
the khida does not list in the shame of
dumb he does not list rubens and
ibishits
apparently he did not want to get
involved in that
but
in the safer dvaram
which is the safer of his drastics
says this chat that if you see someone
who dies and he doesn't have a reason to
die
hinge it on hinge it on that's what it
looks like you put on your special
glasses your your your sin looking
glasses you go to there's a special
store on central avenue you can buy
special guy you could tell
you know that result could look at you
and see what you did for those who are
able to tell you put on those glasses
and you see the guy never did a sin but
the kid says
where did i get this from i saw it in
the yaristavas
which means the only source
for the hespen that that rizal gave on
the ramak is rabbi sanavashits even the
khida who quotes it he tells us where he
got it from he got it from the or the
arastovas
okay
so um and rabbi pershall if i'm saying
it correctly he writes nahal
was published in 1795 to 1797 in levarno
and the khida himself says in the dvara
mahadam which was published in
1788 says he got it from the aristobash
so again i'm not here to give a history
share today
i'm here to discuss a different point
ahash kafa
but we might get into the history a
little bit so so far so good
okay that was about 200 years later
after the hospital
no
40 years
40 50 years
he died
he was alive no no excuse me he was
alive the sin the the safer the lived
from 1724 to 1806. so he the hedonist
or he heard about him he heard about him
however
the
um
was published in 1795. here is the most
juicy part of this year and maybe any
show we said this year
there was a great rabbi living in sas
his name was
rev mordechain
the great lion and the guri hari are the
lion cubs because they are like the
students of the students of the arena he
had a rebbe ravisral d koreal we saw
deep corial was a
a talmud of the arizong and his student
was rab mordechai
amazingly remur khan one of the great
rabbinam and sass had to leave zfass and
take up rabbanus in aleppo in syria why
he didn't have parnassa
he wrote a classic safer on hamish
called
i'm sure many of you may have heard of
the safer
torah not to be confused with the
shachanyardaya it's a little bit of a
kabbalistic work it's like quasi parsha
quasibshad quasi kabbalah
shah torah
mordechai hakoen
the exact opposite of what the rama
supposedly said and the exact opposite
of what the arizona supposedly said
about the ramak not only did he say the
opposite but as we're going to see he
holds that the shot that's being
attributed to the arizal
and the rama that the house division
it's wrong
not only is it wrong it's a navala
and let's read the words
look at number 11.
you're going to see a guy who seems to
be missing a reason to die
if by me
don't let it entertain in your mind to
say
m
regional argument
don't entertain the idea this guy is
perfect the only reason he died is
because he's a descendant of adam marie
shine
no you want to say like this
you see a guy hate misha mothers you
think he's missing a reason to die the
hummus and he dies this alisa is you
want to blame it on the it's hadas
sayala aids don't hinge this nivola
on the sin of the eighth hadas this is
disgusting it's despicable this
hashgaffer is a navala to say the
rebound took away somebody that never
did a sin only because of the sin of the
aids hadas that means the reborn of some
did didn't beloy then he conducted
judgment without reason you're speaking
lush and hard about three bonus shot
better to say the guy did a sin than to
speak badly about god
to me this reminds me of when rev victor
miller used to speak about
the events of 1939 to 1945
and he obviously a very sensitive
subject
and
people used to say how how could you say
reasons you're speaking
badly about the kadoshim and he would
say
you know
and then what say speak last night about
to be banished
so this was an interesting debate to me
this is the exact same thing
they died without sin but for us to see
also
apparently because of admiration
that's the cash on him that's akash you
mean you're saying we know there is such
a phenomenon okay good point
and along comes this gentleman and he
says i disagree with all three of them
well he doesn't quote them
he may not have known they said that
i'm saying right yeah yeah we're going
to discuss that
we're going to say now listen to this
so listen
the guy is missing a reason to die the
whom us and he
on the tree what should you do with such
a thought
can it
cover sickbarreno bury it
don't let it enter your mind don't enter
don't let it enter your thoughts
it's disgusting it's the disparagement
of hashem
don't defile your body your body is
called abdominal because your body comes
to the abdomen
this is the defilement of the soul of
the defilement of the gup you're not
allowed to think that so in other words
that which
the
said the rama said on rabbi
and that which the
son said the rama
not only is it wrong it's disgusting
it's a naval heaven forbid to ever say
such a thing
exactly what i said
so to me
now we're there are two ways of taking
this
the pershall is studying this from
historic perspective which is not that
interesting which is not that important
to me right now it's interesting it's
important but i'm not here to give a
history sure
but i do i do want to discuss the
history but to me what's much more
important than the history
is which hashgraph is correct
if somebody sees a great saddek passing
on
should should one say
look
they're sin free and uh why'd they die
because uh because of the
simulated is that this is that an ebola
is what that what is attributed to these
great godolms
is that wrong
or
is it a valid
in other words are we go would we go
like the shakhala torah or would we go
like what robbie anderson ibishops is
attributing to ariza now in general you
always have mahalika sin in hashgaffa
there's you know
one of the most important signs of
maturity and learning is recognize that
almost everything is a matter of
different opinions it's not shiver that
there's a mahoikas but to me
it's somewhat bothersome to have such a
wide mach like us
especially the shacha later is arguing
on what robbie anderson irish it's
attributed to the ari
so as we're going to see rabbi prashal
feels
that it must be that the rama never gave
this hespit
and the ari didn't say the hasbit and as
we're going to see this hesped was
perhaps given by some other goddamn
and over the time
some of the facts got a little bit
switched
so for example as follows the
look at number 13 the
tinus the says straight up this shot
number 13.
who says exactly if a man will be
missing a reason to die and he dies
blame it on the etadas and the quotes
now i try to look it up
i
saw what the shla is referring to in the
tikkunis
you can look it up it's in
hamishi
it's very hard to read what that desire
is actually
referring to this
but let's let's um learn what rebbe
pershall says and then
let's try to
study it from a different perspective
right okay
i mean
[Music]
well he doesn't believe that you have to
uh divorce stolen means
no of course i'm not questioning
your anyone is allowed to say a drush
but no that's not the question the
question is but the hashkafa behind the
drush the rabbi understand ibishits
fields it's a valid hashgaffer that if
somebody dies you could say they don't
have any sin they died because of sin
about the marishan but the shah latoya
says that hashgaffer is a naval you're
not allowed to say that so how do you
have such a wide mach like is some say
that rizal says
you're allowed to say that in fact that
results said it about ramak so in other
words what rabbi nissan ibishit says
that resolve said about
the
torah calls it a novella
so how do you have something that one of
the great old-time godowners
says that rizal said and a student of
arie called that notion navala
how's that possible who says this over
there number 12.
yes
but he's going against more than that
because
we have we have
it's a known fact
in other words what will the
torah say about the phenomenon that four
people died without sin so i believe he
would say
those four people died without sin they
were people in the hamish there were
people back in the times of tanach
benyamin yishai but to say about someone
in our times or even five hundred years
ago that we're not authorized to do we
know in sadiq baratheon
conclusion is as follows he says
he is highly suspicious
that the arizal ever gave this husband
or that rama ever gave the asset
regarding the rama he says it can't be
we know the shla
was a student of a student of
shalom shakna
dashla's father
was a student of the rama
you don't think the schla growing up
would have heard the hespid
that rama gave under
that he would have to quote a tikkune
zayar why wouldn't he say this is the
hasbit the rama gave on
i personally don't really hear that
argument
the shell is a classic safer he's not
going to bring why would he have to
bring araya from a story
it's a much better raya to quote desire
who says beferosh this is sean
so i'm not so compelled by that question
regarding
the arizal he says how could it be that
the
terror
who is a student of rabbis d coriello
would have said that that this idea as a
naval wouldn't he have known from his
rebbe that the arizona gave this
hospital he lived in smash i mean if
you're living in space in the times of
that reza you're going to know what that
rizal said at the ramak slavaya
so therefore he sort of dismisses the
fact that
the ari really gave this hesped or that
rama really gave this has bid and he
suggested as follows
a couple years ago in the summer i was
in italy i was actually there twice and
we went to the cover of ravmayr katzen
ellenbogen
maharam padua
and he had a son
now ramir katzen allenbogen was from
poland
he was a grandson of mahari mintz
he had a son called shikh
who is shikh
shmuel yehuda katsunalen bogan
okay he's uh his father is maram padua
and he was an italian rabbi one of the
daughters
who gave the hesped for shemo you the
katsuna bogan none other than arya of
modino we once spoke about him in the
past years ago
and he
no no connection relation affiliation or
any association at all with my ramshack
that's just his name shmuel yehuda
maram shikh
got his last name because uh when they
instituted last names he chose shikh
shem israel kaidash that's where that
came from
yeah
so the
rabjen gave a hespid for rabzalman katz
of manitoba
and he said
this man was such a sadiq there was no
hasid like this rav zaman katz
we know the word ish is is a name of
khashevas kulam
kiyabi-ish you're going to see a very
harsh person
hate he's going to be missing
a reason to die
but he
so why did he die
one of two reasons
either the humas other people killed him
because we know there's a concept that
hashem sometimes
brings kapara to the whole dar through
it's sadiq so he reads the passage
he was killed because of others the
muslim visited the sins of others upon
the sadiq the hummus or the salisa is
or hinted on the sin of the etadas
because says
although there's no sadduce
there's no righteous person that never
sinned but this man does not have a
reason to die so why did he die one of
two reasons either of a humas
either because of the sins of others or
because of the sunnah
lived from 1521 to 1597.
he lived in the times of drama and that
rizal
he printed this hespid
this safer was first printed in the year
and it was not printed again for 200
years
so what prashal suggests
is that rizal never said this has been
we have no evidence that results of this
aspect the ramon never said this has
been we have no evidence rama ever said
the husband we know of shmuel yehuda
casanova and bogan gave the husband but
then his saver went out of print for 200
years
and it could be that as the story was
sort of passed over some of the names
got
now
i'm not going to comment on that
it's hard to prove such a thing i'm not
sure if we need to say such a thing
maybe until the rubyness and i bishops
it was well known this is what derezel
said or what ramos said and nobody
recorded it maybe people didn't record
stories i don't know i'm not going to
comment on that but i'm here to comment
on the following issue
how in the world is it possible
that a hashgaffer that ruby anderson
ibishits feels is sound
because he says that reason said it that
the
says is valid because he says that the
arizona said
is a naval
i mean isn't that uh that's such a wide
macholicas that some say it's correct
it's so correct that rizal himself said
it and some say it's a falsehood it's a
disgusting hashgaffer
that's pretty wide
so good
so we want to try to reconcile is there
any way to reconcile
the opinion of urbanism
that it's so correct that really rama
said it with the shah who says it's a
naval
so i have one of three answers
they're all
uh posit they're all theory
but we'll see what you think the first
one is what rabbi is rabbi yossi says
there's a thousand yarder that says at a
hespet are you allowed to exaggerate had
a husband
let's say a guy
claims
you know he divined with a minion
five and a half days a week are you
allowed to say he died in that minion
every day the week are you allowed to
exaggerate at a heisman
the task says your lad exaggerate a
little bit
a little bit you could exaggerate
because everybody is a little bit better
there are different ways of
understanding it the words of the ta's
are because everybody would have done a
little bit better
if they could have or if they had the
ability that's the task you could
exaggerate a little bit
so could we suggest as follows
avada at the hospital of the ramak
is there anybody who never committed a
sin
no ain't sadiq
but there are some people who are pretty
close
so at the time of a hested you're given
license
to exaggerate abyssal so the ariza got
up in history he said the ramak there's
no reason why he had to go we can't
explain it it must have been because
and show himself
but are you really allowed to think that
no
it's wrong
not only is it wrong it's an of allah
because then you're saying the ibanisham
conducted din with a mishpa with abdin
so there's no mahoikis over here
kanbasmana has been you're allowed to
say you have a certain license at a time
of aspen but to see that that's the shot
in the passage
you know how to do that
i'm not fully satisfied with this
because the slaw says this is chad the
possible is not talking about
he's just taiching the passage
that if you see a person missing a
reason to die he dies hinge it on the
it's had us
and the
son says the rama islam said this
he didn't say it at a heisman
here's another possible chat
and that is are you allowed to say if
somebody passes on
they never sinned why'd they die because
of the sin of the eights hadas you know
how to say that it's disgusting it's a
novella how could you say that about the
rebels that he did something for no
reason
however
if you're
if you're an arizal
and you're saying it about a ramak
you could say it
you can't say it about anybody
you have to have you have to be an aries
and then the subject and the person who
you're speaking about has to be a ramak
otherwise you have no right to say such
a thing
just to say about anybody or even
anything anytime
you have to be of a certain cow you have
to be a ramo saying you're better off
you have to be in
again
this doesn't really answer for the shell
because the just says this is
and
the yara sanam says this is
so my
best attempt is as follows and i think
it might be true
if you look at carefully in number 15 at
the hesped rib shmuel you the
katzenellenbogen gave
for this
for this uh great reverb salman katz he
says one two three four five six on the
seventh line
you see a guy who's missing a reason to
die
now when we see he's missing a reason to
get to that doesn't mean he never sinned
because there's nobody who doesn't sin
only those four people in the gemara
never sinned
now i mean you asked before what do you
mean can you deny the fact that the
gemara says four people died without sin
that's right they die without sin but
there's no one else who has no sin
but still says
that
and of course everybody is going to sin
not everybody is going to have kavanaugh
for every word of davning
probably some time in one's life
somebody may slip up somewhere
but the person is missing a reason to
die
they never committed a sin that they
should be high of misa that's what i
don't understand says
i'm not saying this great rav never
sinned avada everybody's sins ain't
sadiq
what i'm saying is he's missing a reason
to die
so perhaps this could reconcile the
shakhala torah with rabbi
to say about someone
i don't understand why they died they
never ever committed any sin why did god
do
this that's an avala
you know how to say somebody never
sinned
in sadly
and if the person sinned then i am
punished
but what you're allowed to say and what
that reason said and what the ramos said
was
shalom
and radharamak
they never committed a sin that would
explain why they had to die
so perhaps this is a way to reconcile
what the aries said according to ruby
and savages and
what rama said according to
and that's what they said was
that that that the ramak or
they never sinned a sin which is mishpat
mothers
they're missing a reason to die but what
the shack perhaps is saying which is a
navala and you're now to take it into
your mind and you need to bury it is to
say oh this person is perfect we don't
understand why anything happened to them
perhaps that is an of allah okay marvel
abuse i'll let you think about it
but uh this is quite an interesting
pasuk and here you have an
interpretation of ravionis and ibishits
and the khida who attribute it to that
read and
trips it's the rama that they set it at
the hospital of the greatest old-time
people and the
torah says this is not the hashgaffer
that we accept
um
but again torah is uh kepatish
yafutsatsela there's so many different
ways to understand it and so many
different streams so
yes
no but other mauricio's different
anybody wanted anybody not to have a
mara
do we have six who didn't have it you've
just experienced another torah class
brought to you by torahanytime.com