0:00 / 0:00
People of the Book - Nodah B'Yehudah
615 views
Join us as we explore the works and thought of R. Yechezkel ben Yehuda HaLevi Landau (8 October 1713 – 29 April 1793) was an influential authority in halakha (Jewish law). He is best known for the work Noda B'Yehudah (נודע ביהודה), by which title he is also known. For more content, visit http://www.rabbiefremgoldberg.org.
Categories:
Torah
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
good evening ladies and gentlemen and
welcome to the next installment of the
bookon synagogue's wonderful program
called people of the book each week we
take you through different personalities
within our Rich tradition uh
transformational leaders and
personalities who contributed to Torah
study to our sacred Torah texts and to
so much more this evening we have the
privilege of learning together about the
great nuda rcal land the Yuda here's my
copy is a staple in any re home and any
B Med his Chas the name Yuda is part of
the tapestry of response to literature
when trying to decide any fundamental
question in Jewish law we would be lost
without the great no without the great
no so tonight we'll learn a little bit
more about who he was the life he led
and his legacy that he leaves us not
only his literary Legacy the legacy of
the Torah that he leaves us but but also
a legacy of leadership well beyond but
let's go back to the very beginning
let's start again from his beginning
from his start from his childhood where
does it begin the lives from 1713 to 79
1793 he's born in opta Poland and
there's a map a little hard to see if
it's small for you but we see his
hometown where he's born he's the son of
rabuda seal and Reb note his father's
name is Yehuda hence the title of his
book no Yehuda we'll see later in his
own words why he chose to name his
magnumopus his respon to literature in
in the name of his father his
grandfather was rabie elzar the r of
dubno he was an only child which is
fascinating the beuda who was an
extraordinary Tam a great leader of the
18th century and whose Legacy continues
till today was in fact an only child his
family was wealthy was distinguished he
did not grow up in poverty he did not
grow up lacking he learned with rebuts
like Isaac of ludmir and he was 12 years
old and after that he was autodidactic
he taught himself not for now but so
many of the personalities of people of
the book who we have seen were in fact
autodidactic they taught themselves they
didn't go to Yeshiva they weren't part
of a system it's not to suggest that we
shouldn't have our yeshivas or that we
should not register our children or
ourselves have regret for having
attended it's not part of the definition
of emerging a that you had to have
learned or taught yourself however it is
a fascinating theme or thread that runs
through this phenomen of teaching and
learning by oneself and not getting lost
or distracted as part of a greater
system when he turns 14 years old went
to learn in bro where he stayed for four
years at 18 years old he decides to
pursue a wife after all the Mish
says at 18 one should get married many
matches were suggested you can imagine
this only child was already emerging to
be very uh uh very precocious very
brilliant he came from an illustrious
family very wealthy very comfortable um
and many of the suggestions included
large diaries that would have allowed
him time to continue sit and to learn
full-time
1732 marries liba the daughter ofak ofno
a wealthy and
charitable so you see he didn't marry
her for her wealth she didn't marry him
for his wealth they each came from
comfortable means but her father was a
and in
fact fulfills the dictate of our great
rabbis who say a person should try to
marry a b one should search for the
daughter of a the daughter of a
righteous person parenthetically I
recently saw writes that not everybody
marries the daughter of a great Rabbi a
Great Sage a great scholar so are they
lacking are they somehow deficient in
some way so
writes is a category the daughter of a
means someone who's raised by the father
and
mother in a certain way in a certain
style and therefore there's certain
assumptions about her own priorities her
values and her lifestyle so our rabbis
tell us marry a or the category of
someone who falls takes it literally he
marries liba the daughter ofno wealthy
and shable after his wedding he goes to
the father-in-law girl wants to live
near her family and in fact they were
taking care enabling him to continue to
learn so after the after their wedding
they go to dubno to be able to study
there
fulltime they were married for close to
60 years which today is extraordinary
and any time is extraordinary I recently
uh called someone to wish on their 71st
wedding anniversary Kan Yu 60 years is a
long time in any generation but
particularly back then in the 18th
century to be married for 60 years which
means that each party had longevity and
that together the couple had happiness
and Longevity is nothing short of
extraordinary in its own right
understood that his Torah
accomplishments were only due to her
support and in fact in his introduction
to his not this magnumopus of his
response to literature he writes qu my
wife has helped me a great deal she was
willing to tolerate my frequent absence
from the house as I devoted myself to
learning Torah he credits his
breakthrough he credits his Fame he
credits his scholarship and contribution
to her she was a partner she was
encouraging she was supportive and she
tolerated his being absent from the home
regularly because that's what it took
for him to become who he who he
was after only a short time in's
father-in-law decided to move back to
bro and asked his daughter and sonin-law
to come and a girl follows her parents
not always but in this circumstance she
did and she moved with her parents back
to bro they agreed and after returning
to the city he had studied him for four
years as a young man now in
1734 he's only 20 years old and just put
that in perspective think about who you
were and what you were doing at 20 years
old think about the 20 year olds you
know today and just consider that Lando
at 20 years old was appointed the a
Basden the chief judge the Chief Justice
of the Bro rical Court of the Brazen the
bason of this great City 20 years old he
served in that position for 11 years and
during that time you rendered very
important and significant H decisions
that made him well known to be the a
bason means that you're here in
complicated cases you're adjudicating
disputes but it also means you're
answering difficult questions and
Penning responsa so even this young man
who began at only 20 and serves in this
role till till uh 31 years old he earned
a rep reputation far and wide for how
brilliant for how wise for how
insightful and for his and for his great
scholarship 1745 and the ban denounced a
man for violating Torah values the man
was well connected with the Russian
government who in turn forced to leave
bro you know the says that you're not
allowed to be fearful and kazal rabis
saned learns from that that a person is
not allowed to be fearful that a person
should not shy away from hearing or
adjudicating dispute a rabbi a scholar a
judge should not refuse a demure from
sitting on a basin because they're
worried about their well-being their
safety the almighty wants us to be in
that position to pursue Justice to
protect it
umed justice is not only sing to be
protected in fact it it flees from us so
much so that we are encouraged and
instructed that we have to run after it
so this man was connected with the
Russian government who turned ones when
Landa was undeterred by his connection
and by his threats um he was forced to
leave they left immediately together
with his in-laws Carriage rode until it
came to a town that turned out to be
dubno and they stayed there for only a
few months before an envelope arrived
and the envelope came from the city of
yampo now what is the city they needed a
chief Rabbi and they heard this
individual who served as the basen at
only 20 years old who had earned a great
reputation who left in fact not with his
tail between his legs he didn't leave in
in shame he didn't leave because he was
run out of town he left in fact in a way
which was really admirable he left
because he was so scrupulous he left
because he was undeterred to pursue
Justice even if a very powerful person
was not going to be on the uh on the
favorable ruling they agreed and
recruited him to be their chief rabba he
agreed he rose to be the rabinal leader
I've B the head of the town's Yeshiva
where many students flock to study with
him now I can tell you as somebody who
does their best to be a rabbi today that
one position is difficult enough one
rabic position is hard to balance it's
hard to manage but when you consider for
a moment that
Reeses Lando served as the r the a the
head of the Yeshiva can only imagine the
responsibilities can only imagine the
time constraints can only imagine the
burden can only imagine the fundraising
he remained in that position for another
10 years and then another envelope
arrived the's life can be summarized the
different stages of his life and the
places he lived by the arrival of these
envelopes imagine if there were email
then how many places he would have moved
now where does this other envelope
arrive from well let's take a step back
and talk about the N Yehuda lives in the
18th century in the 1700s but it comes
on the heels of the Jewish people being
very rocked rocked by the controversy of
shabti who is shab shab 1626 to 1676 it
takes place after Niki slaughtered over
a 100,000 Jews the terrible kitki um uh
persecutions that killed a 100,000 Jews
we're not talking about some small
figures talking about devastating
numbers and after theik slaughtered so
many Jews this Turkish Rabbi and
cabalist emerged and In 1664 shab which
was not his name was proclaimed by
Nathan of Gaza as the long awaited
Messiah as is often the case with false
Messiahs and we could do a whole series
tracing and tracking the false Messiah
throughout Jewish history but as as is
often the case um it's after the in the
aftermath it's in the shadow of a crisis
of a catastrophe of of a total uh
annihilation of the Jewish people that
the people are desperate they're
desperate for a messenger a harbinger of
Hope of optimism of Faith they are ripe
for the possibility of being taken by a
false Messiah it happened many times
before shab and happened after and the
case of shab was no different afteri
slaughtered over 100,000 Jews then chap
emerges on the scene and a disciple
Nathan of Gaza declared him to be the
long awaited Messiah 1666 at age 40 he's
forced by the ottoman Sultan mmed IV to
convert to Islam and with that you can
imagine is the end all these people had
followed him people were confused people
wanted to believe they jumped on the
bandwagon until he was forced to convert
and the one who was supposed to be the
Jewish Messiah himself converted to
Islam obviously that was the end of the
illusion of his serving in that role but
it spurned a series of other false
Messiahs again a reflection of the deep
desperation of the people who were
simply waiting and hopeful wanting
something we can't even begin to compare
what we're going through with this
pandemic to thei revolts that
slaughtered 100,000 Jews to the
Inquisition the Crusades the Holocaust
and the like but we need to know that
the same feelings that many have today
of hopelessness and despondency same
depression the same isolation same
feeling that this is uh the new normal
and it'll never get better everyone's
just waiting for a message of positivity
oh there's a vaccine hope
oh there's a possibility we've learned
something more about the virus wait
there might be a light at the end of the
tunnel we can relate again in our own
small way because of what globally we
are all universally going through but
the Jewish people went through this
regularly when they experienced
catastrophe and crisis and afterwards
they were so desperate for some message
and the message wasn't always or wasn't
often authentic and it came across in a
false way it introduced suspicion for
centuries that great rabbis were really
saans that some great rabbis and this is
of course a topic that Professor schne
Lyman has lectured on extensively JJ
shakar who has a dissertation ROV emden
has lecture on extensively um but the
whole suspicion that even great rabbis
whose names were so familiar with were
saans were followers of shab that they
two were swept up in the movement was an
enormous suspicion 1725 a group of
rabbis in Prague announced that
followers of shab shab was long dead
we're already into the next Century but
still continuing to feel his influence
that followers of shab should be
excommunicated the rabbis were led by
the head of praga rit in 1751 wrote a
Kamya an amulet an amulet is worn around
the neck is supposed to have medicinal
and healing uh capacity soit great
cabalists and Mystics and Scholars had
certain traditions of how to write such
a Kam such an amulet for sick people and
himself in 1751 wrote such an amulet for
a sick woman who was wored about dying
in child birth there's a sample of the
amulet on the right if you're listening
online later there's a PowerPoint you
can find it in the YouTube video The
Great rakov announced the suspicion that
RIT
himself was a follower of shab and
embedded references to the false messiah
in that amulet and here we have this
Collision of two the greatest rabbis of
the time rakov emden rakov Emin there
not a page of mish that urn that doesn't
quote the decisions of Rak
is a of the German World at the time and
since then and here we have this
Collision of the two rakov the
Contemporary RIT is accusing him of
embedding into that amulet messages
about CH that he is in fact a Sati and a
follower of shab a huge controversy
erupts and rabbis from all over the
world weigh in including such great
luminaries as the P Yeshua of Yeshua FAL
and others again we've examined uh in
the courses at BRS and there are
phenomenal Scholars and scholarship on
these topics but it's fascinating that
not only is there collision
between but that it's able to draw in
some of the greatest sages and leaders
of the time so many wrote to one of
those great sages who at that time had
already earned a reputation had served
as AB rashash a he earned a reputation
as a great tamic scholar and leader so
in
1754 r Yuda who gets drawn into this
controversy and drawn into this conflict
pin a letter called
igom means a letter of peace and his
goal his mission is to try to reconcile
these two great
rabbis shouldn't be together at War
yakob em in every day he had a he had a
printing press in his basement and it's
been said about him I think JJ Shaker
says about him how this controversy
would have been different and that
historical period would have been
different if rakov then every time he
wrote something he had to bring it to a
publisher and he had to convince them
that it was worth publishing that it
would in fact sell he didn't he had the
equivalent today of a copy machine of a
mass printer in his basement and with
every thought he was able to print it
and things could have been or would have
been different if not so Rando weighs in
in this controversy and he writes the
following quote let us gain
understanding from the elders and learn
from the wise the sages of the T
declared that the book of K should be
part of tanak both its beginning and its
end teach the fear of Heaven similarly
this Torah genius Ritz is also full of
fear of Heaven from his beginning to his
end from his youth until today he has
toiled to learn Torah without cease he
has acquired the Torah and taught it to
others and as our sages say sin cannot
come about through a holy person hisus
his saintliness is humility his Good
Deeds are well known he's helped many
people abandon their evil ways who else
in our generation speaks out against
evil as strongly as he indeed he
concludes the reason the amulet should
be put away has to be made clear so that
no one misunderstands it it should be
clear to everyone that is not is not
suspected of having any bad intent and
that he is perfectly blameless so the
weighs in he tries to bring together and
reconcile these two sides he says put
the amulet away get rid of the Kamya let
it not be the subject of controversy or
suspicion let no one accuse it even
falsely of having satian references but
on the other hand how could anyone
accuse the
great just like our rabbis debated the
book of cois which so easily be
misunderstood and misconstrued
ultimately it begins with and ends with
a message of fear of heaven and
therefore earns a place in the Canon so
to
who he's righteous in his fear of heaven
and therefore he earns a place in the
cannon of Jewish history of Torah
scholarship of
great and it should be without without
question um okay
continuing Prague Jews had lived in
Prague since the very beginning of the
city in the 1300s again there was more
to talk
about I just wanted to share the the the
huda's contribution to that conversation
to that controversy the next period is
is is related to associated with the
city of Prague Jews had lived in Prague
since the very beginning of the city the
1300s they were confined to a ghetto
which expanded with the Jewish
population and the center of the ghetto
was the Alton a great and beautiful
building that's a picture of it on the
right the old new that's the combination
of its names Alta means old new
obviously new Alta the old new was
originally built in 1270 and it was
restored Renovations were made and the
residents of Prague included great
Scholars Prague was
in it was a great City position of Chief
Rabbi of Prague was among the most
coveted among the most prestigious in
Europe it had to be filled by somebody
who was worthy had previously been held
by
the and by the lman heler these were
individuals not only for their great
works but known for who they were their
great leadership so this position as the
as the chief Rabbi of Prague Prague as I
said was
an in 1740 Charles I 6 died and his
daughter Maria Tesa became Empress of
Hungary and Bohemia in 1744 four years
later a Pious Catholic gave an order
expelling Jews from Prague a year later
she expanded the decree to expel Jews
not only from Prague but from all of the
broader area Bohemia and Aria and the
second decree was never carried out but
the expulsion from Prague was enacted so
Jews who had such a long and illustrious
history with Prague Prague a city that
was so synonymous with Jewish people and
Jewish leadership became uden and became
free of Jews as Jews were expelled 1748
after tremendous bargaining and
negotiations just a short time later
Jews were allowed back to their homes in
Prague in exchange for an extraordinary
High tax you know whatever problems we
have have whether you live in Israel
America if you're living in a democracy
which is welcoming Jews to live equal
lives equal rights the challenges can't
be minimized or understated but how
blessed we are to live in such blessed
times when you think back to Prague 18th
century not that long ago and so many
other cases of expulsions and Jews were
allowed to go back to their own homes
not because there was some sense of
regret or remorse not because of some
sense of justice not because of some
cancel culture Jews were allowed to go
back to their homes because they they
agreed to pay an extraordinary High tax
if the Jews would contribute to the
economy by paying an unfair High tax
then they were allowed to come home so
once they came back to Prague it was
time to select the new Chief Rabbi and
who was there other thanes Land one
person objected saying he supported
rakov Emon by demanding that R put the
amulet away and another person said the
exact opposite what are you talking
about he supported Rak of by putting the
amulet away he's aor by testifying so
boldly about his righteousness he sided
with
and testified to his innocence when in
fact
maybe was right maybe in fact was a
satian and as they debated which side he
had taken they came to realize that in
fact igaram was a brilliant attempt to
not take either side they realized what
too many leaders failed to realize that
their goal is not always to take a side
sometimes it's try to bring peace and to
bring Harmony it's to be effective not
always to be
right had not tried to take a side or
endorse either side he had simply tried
to restore a sense of peace and Harmony
and they came to understand that they
decided they were worthy to extend an
invitation toel to leave yampo this was
the new envelope that had arrived that
we alluded to and with that he went from
yampo and became the chief Rabbi of
Prague and upon accepting it he was
welcomed to Prague and the way that he
was welcomed was with Pomp and
Circumstance live music a band dancing a
big celebration a big suda the streets
were filled with people who so excited
and eager to rush into a new era of
Rabin leadership and scholarship
celebrating likely not only the arrival
of the N Yuda but their own return to a
city they had been expelled from and to
restore it to its roots of greatness of
Jewish greatness with a Jewish great
leader one of R's first priorities in
Prague was to strengthen the Yeshiva
there he spent only half a day
functioning as a rabbi as a RV and he
dedicated the other half to learning and
teaching in the Yeshiva each day Hali he
was able to find that balance and he
served both as rashash Shiva he had a
shear and the r of the community of the
city he continued teaching when others
took off the Yesa met during and on fast
days and on Fridays in this way maybe
it's a precursor to the zberman Yesa
which is the only day that it is off I
think it's Tish I think they even have
yes on Yumer afternoon and here this yes
of prag the Yuda never took off the nuda
continued to teach even on days that
others considered or called between the
periods of learning he never took off he
begins many of his letters by stating he
doesn't have much time and he references
because he's very busy in the Yesa he
was very dedicated to his students
prominent among them we
know Danzig who is a great great
grandfather of Rabbi Mas thean lived
1748 to
1820 he was a businessman who ultimately
princ this wonderful work as well was a
student was a of the Yuda so was the M
Mario who wrote many notable in among
them and
the who lives 1754 to 1826 these are
among his prominent students in one
letter he writes theud I received your
letter and I recalled your studies in
the yes and yo and now I'm happy to hear
that you've become a rabbi in a
community he was dedicated to his
students he stayed in touch to his
students he corresponded with his
students in another letter of his we
have he writes to tell the truth I've
been very surprised that you haven't
written since leaving me nevertheless I
asked about you and I heard that you are
succeeding in your learning I'm always
delighted to hear that my students have
grown and succeeded that is my delight
both in this world and the world to come
sometimes people don't appreciate just
today I got a phone call from somebody
who consulted me several months ago
about a difficult question in his family
life and uh called me today to follow up
and tell me that there was very good
news as a followup and I said thank you
a lot of times Rabon rabbis rash Yeshiva
Rim moras teachers we invest ourselves
in others and we're there in difficult
times we don't always know what happens
in the end what the outcome is so you
see this goes back this is not a new
phenomena gando himself says to his
students I was so dedicated to you and
you graduated and left the Yeshiva I
hadn't heard from you so eager to know
how you're doing and what's doing 1763
after the seven-year War Jews were
financially decimated in order not P
pressure on people the created communal
takos and this is one of the things that
he's famous for uh don't try this at
home today
but the created these communal takas
number one he limited the amount of
money people could spend on celebrations
they should not be too ostentatious they
shouldn't put people in debt it
shouldn't create a sense of
competitiveness or shame for the people
who can't number two only 10 men can be
invited to a bar mitzvah meal besides
the boy his father the caterer and out
of town guests I assume the mother too
in addition there can only be 10 men
invited so you'd have a minion but it
shouldn't get too big too broad it
shouldn't be again too too large no
musicians are B at the meal if a person
pays less than a certain amount of
communal taxes he may serve only beef
duck or chicken but not two of those
dishes so this is a detailed detailed
Tak can you imagine Raam they've tried
it Tak weddings Tak Simas hasn't qu on
but imagine that level of detail of what
you can serve on the menu if you are
receiving scholarship from school or
you're receiving du's adjustment to sh
or you're not uh able to pay your fair
share in these other institutions then
there was a Tak that you were also
Limited in the type of SIM you could
make no more than four musicians at a
wedding the banquet no more than 15
couples no walking around with expensive
clothing no more small private man in
people's houses instead of coming to sh
I like that last takana not during
pandemic times when it's much more
complicated but he was Community Driven
there should be a sense of community and
even if there are other localized M they
should be coordinated through Community
not private m in people's homes back to
our friend Maria Teresa despite her
varent anti symatic measures reesco
wrote a prayer for her recovery from
smallpox she was struck with small pox
in 1767 he delivered a public eulogy in
fact when she died uh 1780 13 years
later where he extols her virtues and
contributions did he really admire her
or was this Shalom was this in order of
diplomacy with local authorities he
praised her political skills as a ruler
and he acknowledged her as a warrior and
uh described her piety and aesthetic
lifestyle and philanthropy he really
laid it on thick about about her um
again we have the eulogy that he gave um
I'm sure he meant it would never lie but
I'm sure it was also strategic and that
was a sad story a sad element of his
life a terrible fire broke out in the
small ghetto and's home was burned and
you can imagine in those days you didn't
sit with a keyboard and a computer an
internet connection you didn't upload it
to the cloud and have it backed up in
several different ways it was
handwritten and his writings which he
had labored over toiled over his
writings many of them were lost in that
fire in his home in Prague and he took
it as a sign that it was time to publish
so in 1777 his
respon was published on all four
sections
of including 850 resp respon 850
letters detailed complicated uh
referencing really comprehensive he
explains in the introduction that he
called it no beuda
which is an expression that comes
from and what does means known no welln
beuda because he writes quote the only
reason I'm famous is due to the Merit of
my father Yehuda who was a great man
when we began I told you pay attention
to his father's name and he points out
with great humility and with modesty
that the reputation he has is not earned
from himself but rather with humility he
says it comes from his father his
response to these Chas know to be they
spread quickly and broadly he began
receiving letters of rebuttal and
agreement further questions and he has a
correspondence around them he
corresponds with people in the Bohemian
lands in Poland Germany Italy when you
are established as a great when people
admire and see you as an authority and
they either seek your backing or they
disagree with you because they disagree
with your conclusion he's able to have
this correspondence he addresses his
response in a very personal way
identifying and mentioning his
correspondence often sometimes you have
some post in their tras where barely
reference uh by name the people who've
written to them or any circumstance uh
in which they're living and you know
nothing about their times their
contemporary times the is different he
mentions his respondents by name and
identifies them he when he asked why he
answered ignorant people he says quote
it is my custom to answer whoever writes
to me even the smallest of the
small and that too is another expression
of his humility that that whatever the
question it reminds me of mosha
Feinstein zal had a woman in the Lower
Side in his neighborhood he used to call
him every Friday and ask him what time
Li benching what time is candle lighting
for chabas and he didn't say get a
calendar lady ask somebody else what are
you asking me there was no question that
was too small and that is a very very
important point for everybody not just
for rabbis who answer questions but to
help people learn and realize that
there's no question that is too small
1783 he published the first volume of a
slap so we talked about his nuda which
he began to publish after that fire and
maybe it's his magnumopus he's most
welln by that name we refer to him we
call him not we call him theud but he
has other very important works as well
1783 the is an
Acron it's a commentary in the and it's
based on the sh he used to give Thea
remember he wasn't just a wasn't just a
POS but he was a not just an he was a
rash and the
sh he publishes the on the volumes of
Tad in subsequent years he published
further volumes and after he was too ill
his son published more and his other
include the 1827 published POS humously
sermons and
homes do if you look on the side of the
addition you have the comments the gloss
on the from
the known as the
dooa while he was a great traditionalist
he was not opposed to certain change
changes and reforms on the one he's part
of the traditionalist community and he
defended the M of our people but on the
other hand he was open in response to
the rule that all children were required
to receive a secular education he helped
found a government supervised Jewish
Elementary School in Prague in 1782 he
didn't outright oppose it categorically
but he rather said Jews should be in
charge in control of it and help found
this government supervised School 1788
when Joseph II became the first European
ruler to enlist Jews he supported
conscription he spoke to the first group
before they set off so you see again
that even while he was a traditionalist
in many respects in many regards he also
was open-minded in others and even if he
didn't believe necessarily in
conscription or in secular education he
was a very Visionary leader who
understood that better for for him to be
in charge better for the Jewish people
to have our destiny in our own hands
than to leave it to others which could
bring oppression and
persecution what was the relationship
between theud and
the B was born 13 years before so he's
an earlier contemporary and began a
movement that we know swept across
Europe we've spoken in the past great
rivalries aboutus versus misus B versus
the gro you can find it online like many
other great rabbis including the villain
the gone opposed kasas and here is a
paradox here is an enormous irony which
is difficult in many ways to understand
Lando was opposed to kidus there were
others who weren't
proos um but they weren't opposed they
Were Somehow neutral or tried to remain
neutral among them maybe but was opposed
toid and yet admired him why for his
greatness
described as quote a New Soul the of the
B said he had no equal in deciding and
had never made a mistake in his
decisions B himself is
aor but he describes the as the last
word in years later
son writes quote were still alive I
would climb under his table to serve at
his feet because his intentions were for
all for the sake of Heaven he was an
extraordinarily holy and Pious man so
despite his own opposition
toas didn't oppose him they embraced him
they admired him they revered him and
they followed him now he issued many
rulings disputing practices again Theus
of today Rando would be proud of he
would be part of be part of he' be proud
of and he would have no problem with but
the early which had some practices and
Customs he viewed at as needing to push
back for example two Chas he has a
Chu where the had introduced a new
practice if we had the time I'd learn
these tras with you inside they're
fascinating introduced a new practice
which was to say the
formula before doing a Mitzvah they
found that people were doing Mitzvah
mindlessly they were simply performing
them uh
mul they were doing it by rote so how do
you get somebody to Center themselves to
focus to do it mindfully not mindlessly
by having a meditation to recite
something before you do the ACT It
Centers you it focuses you shuts out
distractions and now you're ready to do
the Mitzvah so they introduced
this beforeand cabalistic Mystic the
ability to unite worlds change the
cosmos through this mitzah to be focused
and do it till today in
wres he is opposed to it it's a
beautiful Chua why he says the idea is
lovely the idea is important however we
already have a formula we already have
something that we say in order to make
us Mindful and in order to focus before
we do a Mitzvah what is that thing it's
called a we make a Mitzvah we say a on
doing the Mitzvah then he has another
chuva began the practice of uh going to
visit one's rebi for Yan even maybe
leaving one's family showing preference
or precedence to be with rebi over even
one's
family where he's opposed to this
practice why because he says really
this's a mitvah from the
Torah Jews around the world were
supposed to ascend toim and to convene
together on the sh the three festive
holidays of course that is no longer
binding it's no longer in effect we do
it in a commemorative fashion but the
actual
of Al of coming to without a functioning
BOS is not enforced it's not
practice in that he says if you're going
to not go you're not going to go greet
and visit Theon but you're gonna
continue and maintain going to visit and
greet youbi what does that say about
Hashem what does that say about
priorities and therefore he was opposed
to that practice and others he was very
upset and censured Moses mendon's
translation of Kish into German he
feared would lead to the study of high
German and it would lead to assimilation
and again he was very pre and prophetic
in that the musum in turn because theand
opposed Moses Mendelson and opposed the
Enlightenment and opposed this progress
what they thought was progress the
musculin in turn uh censored his
writings and rejected his View and
reciprocated right on him now he
introduces us to a concept what's that
picture on the upper left is a man
hunting beuda and again I'd love to
study this with you if we could um has
Chua about hunting in tanaa Simon yud
and he introduces a category there it's
fascinating Chua not just because of his
conclusion it's a fascinating Chua
because of a concept he really
introduces what we call Met sometimes we
have Hal which is the strict ruling the
strict law and we have metah we have
what is the spirit of the law what is
something that isn't intangible you
can't point to a specific uh source and
yet in a um in a more Transcendent kind
of way the Met is something that
shouldn't be done and he develops this
in the concept of hunting speaks to the
issue of values which are independent of
Law and he writes quote I am most
surprised at the very question he was
asked about hunting can Jews go hunting
Hally and he writes a whole Chua and he
addresses the issues of you're not
allowed to make an animal suffer and
you're not allowed to waste things is it
a waste to kill animal for no purpose
are you making the animal suffer for no
purpose can you justify hunting for
sport and for fun for recreation to hunt
because you need leather to hunt for um
the parts is one thing but for
recreation for entertainment he he
concludes that technically speaking
Hally it's permissible however here he
invokes the metah concept the idea of
value Beyond just the law and he writes
quote I'm most surprised at the very
question for the only Hunters we the
Torah are nimr and asov this is not the
way of children of and yov how can a Jew
actively kill an animal while motivated
by no need other than enjoying himself
in a hunting so essentially he writes
technically it's okay I can't find a
reason to object to oppose however
beyond the technical law is the value
the Met is the spirit of the law why
would a Jew want to hunt it would
exhibit cruelty for no reason that's
what's entertaining to kill to take a
life of another living entity a creation
of the almighty the only Hunters we find
in the Torah are people who are evil who
are associated with wickedness Nim and
ASV and yov are not Hunters they're
Shepherds so how could a Jew want to
engage in such activity he has other
very famous
responsa that he's well known by is Tru
about autopsies when are you allowed to
do an autopsy if you would learn
something in order to be able to save a
life but he discusses the concept of
is are you doing the autopsy because
maybe you'll learn something that can
maybe Save a Life in the future well the
maybe saving a life in the future that
is not a that sick person is not right
before us right now so how do you define
saving a life saving a life that's not
even yet at risk or can you only does it
only supersede other Concepts and values
if you're saving a life that is
currently at risk what about delaying
burial when is it permissible to delay
burial when it will bring greater honor
to the
deceased he has a Chu about uh offering
an oath in a secular Court when a person
is asked to swear to affirm choose today
we say he should say they want to affirm
they don't want to swear there's a
famous story of the get of cleaves which
was a whole uh a whole episode of
somebody who was at times sane and at
times insane the giving of the get and a
controversy surrounding the validity of
that get shaving
onid is
famous for his opinion about modern
eggs is one of the sh of it's one of the
sh that we learn certain mitzvas in the
Torah require and demand consuming
amount of food the size of an egg so has
the size of eggs changed has that
standard and measurement changea asserts
that yes the eggs today are different
size than they were earlier and then he
has a chuva fascinating chuva it's fasc
ch Simon L and he discusses the
following fasc in case I remember in
sheir this is what made people's ears
perk up there was uh people then um in
that time right we're talking the 18th
century and earlier there wasn't Yeshiva
dormitories you didn't stay in the dorm
you didn't eat in the cafeteria people
had what was called tag you stayed at
the home of a host and if you were lucky
they fed you and invited you to
participate in their meal so he has a
truth about the following case there's a
young man from out of town he's
attending the Yeshiva and he's living at
the home of the rash Shiva and as it
turns out while the rashash is in
Yeshiva giving Shear this young B this
young student is having an inappropriate
relationship with the rabbitson with the
rashash shiva's wife what is the
consequence must he tell the rashash
Shiva what will that mean for the
rashash shiva's ability to stay with his
wife what should be how should they
react what are the Halas
about and and who do you tell and how do
you tell and what do we know it's a
fascinating Chua now what about his
family what about his offspring his
daughter fra married rabad a Tor giant
he has a son Yakov who lived 1745 to
1822 was a
scholar Merchant in bro bro he has a son
sh 1750 to 1834 the Bas of Prague has a
son is who was a Hebrew printer and
influential in in prague's HCA and he
had three more daughters in fact in the
introduction to at least my volume of
the no Yuda he has not only the
introduction of the author
of which is only one page which is
theak but he has
theak the son of the author which is
many many pages long signed
by so so that son became the I guess
heir to the Torah of the nuda he becomes
the ab of Prague writes this long
introduction to his NOA he also had
three more daughters now his wife of 60
years liba dies in 1790
she had raised their children and
supported him in all of his learning and
communal leadership as we saw he in his
own writing credits her with his
scholarship with his breakthrough with
his
accomplishments was broken by her loss
despite being a brilliant public speaker
he sat silently at her funeral he
couldn't bring himself he was at a loss
for words this great orator this great
brilliant man this genius this author
this this rashash this R when his wife
60 years six decades his life life
partner the love of his life from a
young age 18 years old when she left
this world he couldn't find the words
two weeks after his death he called
everyone to the Bas medish only then
after two weeks was he able to eulogize
and with a broken Spirit he said quote
because I wasn't worthy I did not pass
away and serve as an atonement for the
sins of the generation but she my
saintly wife dies died as an atonement
for the sins of the generation and for
my sins as well and now I grieve for
This calamity that has struck me in my
old age I feel that what has happened to
me is as great as the destruction of the
B
I do not even have the strength to cry
for my tragedy you can hear in his own
words how broken he is three years later
when he's 80 years old became sick for
two days lay in bed unable to speak but
his lips continuously were uttering the
Vio and offering the daving the prayers
of the end of life 17th of er
1793 Landa passes away he's buried on
like B om all of Prague the great City
that he was the chief Rabbi of went into
mourning he had been their leader he was
11 years here and 10 years here but his
real his real status was Prague the
chief Rabbi of Prague rashash Shiva
basen for 38 years almost four decades
he left a will asking that he not be
eulogized with the title sad or we've
seen several times his humility and how
he saw himself and so in his will he
asked do not refer to him in the
eulogies as aad or he asked only a
simple gravestone be placed over his
grave and that it not be engraved with
praise that is the life that is the
legacy of the N Yehuda that his
upbringing his wife his children The
Works that was his professional career
and the trajectory the different places
it took you saw what his priorities and
values were by the takos that he enacted
that there shouldn't be ostentatiousness
people shouldn't show off uh public um
um celebrations have to be done with
humility and with
modesty um adapting with the government
when it came to secular education or
conscription he is a communal leader
he's an enormous Tam he's an enormous
POS and uh here are some suggestions for
further reading if you like uh articles
from which I took this I took this
subject I hope you enjoyed the Life and
Legacy of the nuda and I hope you're
enjoying our people of the book we hear
names nuda SL we've heard these names D
all describing the same person but how
much do we know about him we should know
them that's the background of why we
started this this uh people of the book
program because we hear these names we
throw them around we reference we quote
we even share the
we should know about their Life and
Legacy thank you so much for joining
tonight stay happy stay healthy stay
holy if you'd like to continue learning
with us tomorrow morning at 8:15 we'll
be having our 10 minutes of meeting here
on the YouTube channel at 8:45 living
with amuna and tomorrow night uh we're
going behind the Bea with r y gold until
then everyone have a wonderful evening
and thank you for joining