Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
progress.
>> Okay.
Discusses
raven which began on
of if a man assured his son-in-law in
Han but he he still wants to give money
to his daughter. Yeah, it could happen
such a thing that the guy doesn't
doesn't go for the son-in-law but he
still wants to help his daughter. So he
told his son-in-law, you know, get lost.
I answer you Bahana but you still want
to give money to your daughter. So what
do you do? You have to like circumn the
son-in-law. What do you do? You tell the
girl, "Here, I'm giving you this money."
Excluding the son-in-law and
but I'm only giving it to you that you
should buy food and I'm not giving you
the food until you swallow it. This way
at no point in time the son-in-law gets
it. So, Rav takes the Mishna literally
that you literally must say on condition
the son-in-law has no rights to it and
it's going to you when you put it in
your mouth. And
says even though the Mishna says that he
disagrees because he says um the Mishna
is going like
and says I disagree with that. I hold
so you don't have to say I'm only giving
it to you when you put it in your mouth.
I'm I'm saying I'm giving it to you and
it shouldn't go to the son-in-law does
not hold
Rav holds like
holds and so who do we pas and like
that's the subject we're going to
discuss usually when it comes to
monetary matters
is like when it comes to
the rush says that Rav
Rav was uh very excelled in
excelled in
some say was a doctor
knew the practicum. The Gamar says
knew the astronomy like he knew the
streets of is very practical. He knew.
So this is D.
So the should be like
even though by the way wait a second but
it's a d ofadim.
You're making you're answering his
son-in-law with a nad. Now the question
is
does he get is does that forbid him from
somehow getting this these possessions?
In other words, the question is it is
the about is but it's rooted in money.
So is this called is or is this called
m. So the run says 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3
4 five six seven
on the eighth wide line on
the quotes interestingly I don't
remember
ever quoted in Iran
he holds the is like
Even though here the seems to be
regarding
what is forbidden
since the main is dependent on
do we say a hand and woman is like her
husband
we go like
when it comes
Rav goes like we never pass like
goes like
and also throughout Shas it seems that
it's enough to stipulate as long as a
husband doesn't have rights in it even
if you don't say I'm only giving it to
you when it's in your mouth and you
already swallowed it. A few lines down,
the ran raen.
The raen does not hold like
holds like
why
they're arguing about
therefore it would only help
and you add
And
so this is a very interesting that even
though we know the is like
but this case it's but it's dependent on
so therefore
pask like he says it's uh it's dam
it's d Ra
and the rivet say okay it might be
rooted in din but it's regarding and
therefore the is like
so that's an interesting application of
so what about if it's that has
ramifications for is
a median road
But the holds
the says that even according to you need
both.
You need to say on condition the husband
has no rash and you need to say do
whatever you want because the ra
explains that argue as follows
and no other would help
doesn't work and holds No, it's lavka
mashi also works
but everybody agrees you need two.
Anyway, this is just uh an illustration.
This is an example of in general we
passing like by like and here's an
example of between
and
they say here this is we passing like
and
the say no this is ultimately
and therefore we passing like that's
just one little I want to bring to your
attention here
Okay, have a great rest of the day.
>> Just a quick question. Whenever you
whenever if I give something over to
Freddy and I make a condition on what
I'm giving it to him, that that means
that he does not have full control.
Correct. That it's not I'm not fully
transferring over. If I tell him you can
only use it with your eyes closed or
whatever, does that mean that he doesn't
have full control and therefore it's not
fully it? Once I can impose a condition,
it's not his and he doesn't have the
right to give it over to anybody else.
>> Yeah. But so why can't you do that with
let's say the daughter,
>> right?
>> Because you can't you can't stipulate
against the reality which is she doesn't
have her own yad, you know. So what are
you gonna say on condition the husband
doesn't have rash? But what do you mean?
But she doesn't have independent yad,
you know. So
>> just start
>> and it gets into also this week's para
we had a share on this this morning you
know do you need to double stipulate in
other words you need to say I'm only
giving this to you if you do a and and I
say if you I'm not giving it to you if
you don't do you know
>> right
that's usually the case right you have
to do that
>> usually you do but
if if
If it's something like you say, I'm only
giving this I'm giving this to you when
it rains. So, it didn't happen yet. So,
then you might not have to double
stipulate. It's only if it's here right
now
and now you want to control it, you have
to double. But if it's like off into the
future, it's dependent on a future
occurrence,
then it might be different.
>> Very nice.
>> Recording stopped. So,
